case law air 1964 ker 277 - An Overview
case law air 1964 ker 277 - An Overview
Blog Article
If your employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC could dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had an opportunity to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is often only performed In case the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. From the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence and also the petitioner company responded to the allegations as a result they were well conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to become appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The lots of this power casts an obligation around the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for just a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more
Stacy, a tenant inside a duplex owned by Martin, filed a civil lawsuit against her landlord, claiming he experienced not specified her ample notice before raising her rent, citing a fresh state regulation that requires a minimum of ninety times’ notice. Martin argues that The brand new law applies only to landlords of large multi-tenant properties.
This ruling has conditions, and For the reason that petitioners failed a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based on the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above facts and circumstances in the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 from the Constitution. Read more
2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. Additionally they stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi models, with non-compliance facing departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, They're directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. 12. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
one hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of get more info Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 on the Constitution based about the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued for the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement inside the FIR lodged by FIA and from the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice from the Peace u/s 22-A is just not obliged to afford a possibility of hearing for the accused party; nor obliged to essentially or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is required to take into consideration all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal law from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are several of the relevant factors. Read more
Because of this, simply just citing the case is more likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Think of it as calling someone to tell them you’ve found their misplaced phone, then telling them you live in this sort of-and-such community, without actually giving them an address. Driving throughout the neighborhood attempting to find their phone is probably going to get more frustrating than it’s well worth.
The DCFS social worker in charge of your boy’s case experienced the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her 6-month report into the court, the worker elaborated over the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to move him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle established by a court, which other courts are obligated to abide by.
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's effectively-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within ninety times. If your appeal is not decided within that timeframe, he/she can then method the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as the 90 times for that department to act has already expired. Within the aforesaid proposition, we are guided from the decision of your Supreme Court while in the case of Dr.
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar trouble. When they sue their landlord, the court must make use of the previous court’s decision in applying the legislation. This example of case regulation refers to two cases read from the state court, for the same level.
eight. To the reasons stated over, this court finds the petition for being without legal or factual foundation and therefore dismisses it. This court concurs with the respondents' position as contend from the comments, and their request is thus acceded to. All pending applications, if any, are also dismissed. Read more
The figured out Tribunal shall decide the case on merits, without being influenced through the findings while in the Impugned order, after recording of evidence from the respective parties. Read more